The reviewer carries out a scientific examination of the author's materials, as a result of which his actions must be unbiased, consisting of the following principles.
confidentiality
The manuscript received for review must be considered a confidential document that cannot be transferred for review or discussion to third parties who are not authorized to do so by the editors. unpublished data obtained from manuscripts submitted for review must not be used by The reviewer for personal purposes.
objectivity
The reviewer must give an objective and reasonable assessment of the presented research results. personal criticism of the author is unacceptable.
A reviewer who, in his opinion, does not have sufficient qualifications to evaluate the manuscript must inform the editor about this, with a request to exclude him from the review process.